Leading Drs Demand Immediate Suspension Of Covid Jabs Due To Unprecedented Side Effects

Thousands of doctors and healthcare professionals signed a petition earlier this year calling for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccines

They said the jabs were contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.

Known as the HOPE Accord, the online petition makes five calls to the international community in relation to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, that were given emergency use authorisation, stating that “a growing body of evidence suggests that they are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths”.

The petition has been followed up by an open letter to the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) this week. It was drafted by British Indian Consultant Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra who has been campaigning for a more evidence-based approach to all COVID vaccines.

The Daily Sceptic reports: The petition calls for “independent investigations to be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all COVID-19 products. There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their effect on the human body, both short and long term.”

There are additional calls for immediate recognition and support for the vaccine-injured. “The vaccine-injured must be recognised, and every effort must be made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment, as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed.”

It also states, “The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the COVID-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to ensure the relevant facts are known and vital lessons are learned. An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.”

An open letter to the General Medical Council of the U.K., written by Consultant Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and signed by several leaders in health, also makes reference to the petition of which he is a co-founder. The letter was CC’d to key figures, including the Chief Medical Officer Sir Chris Whitty, the Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Government Patrick Vallance, and the Secretary of State for Health Wes Streeting.

Dr. Malhotra says that, given the level of evidence of unprecedented harm, their position not to suspend the Covid mRNA products is now untenable. Re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomised controlled trials on the Covid mRNA products by independent experts, including the associate editor of the BMJ, revealed a greater risk of serious harms from the vaccine than from being hospitalised with Covid. This rate of serious harm is 1 in 800 at two months, suggesting the harms are likely much greater, as it does not take into consideration medium- to long-term harms, including heart attacks, strokes and cancer. Conversely, the level of benefit in the highest-risk group – those over 90, according to U.K. HSA data for 2024 – is 1 in 7,000 to prevent a Covid hospitalisation. In other words, there is at least an eight times greater risk of harm than benefit in this group.

A similar story of the overstatement of findings without attention to methodology applies to the highly publicised headline, “millions of lives saved” from a WHO report. While the headline is attractive, the data is derived from a modelling study that doesn’t enter into the hierarchy of evidence-based medicine studies (poor-quality evidence) and has been described by the Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, Carl Heneghan, as “implausible”. It’s like saying the best football team in the Premier League is a fourth-division club, whilst completely ignoring the Liverpools and Manchester Cities of this world. In other words, such a claim is fake.

Two of the world’s pre-eminent experts in oncology and immunology, respectively, feel there is strong mechanistic evidence, through different pathways including prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination, that the Covid mRNA vaccines cause cancer. The thought that billions of people have been injected with a potential carcinogen is so horrific to bear that one can understand why medical professionals who encouraged patients to take the vaccine would rather choose to bury their heads in the sand. But such wilful blindness will not eliminate an ongoing problem. It is staggering beyond comprehension that the U.K. is still recommending this product, given its poor efficacy and serious, unprecedented harms, including the irrefutable risk of death in the short term for a sizeable minority.

The letter to the GMC also explains why the medical regulators for drug approval, such as the MHRA and FDA, cannot be trusted to be independent because they take most of their funding from the pharmaceutical industry, an industry that has been diagnosed as psychopathic in its pursuit of profit. It describes the recent revelations by the Secretary of State for Health at the time, Matt Hancock, ordering the MHRA to “shut down” vaccine concerns when the AstraZeneca vaccine was being rolled out as a “scandal”.

Failure to acknowledge the clear and overwhelming evidence of serious harm from these products, which have caused a “public health calamity”, is due to either ignorance, wilful blindness or commercial corruption, Dr. Malhotra writes.

He concludes: “At this point in time, the evidence of the Covid mRNA product doing significantly more harm than good is overwhelming, even for the highest-risk groups. The longer the General Medical Council, the Secretary of State for Health and the Chief Medical Officer delay acting on this, the greater the harm to public health, the further decrease in trust in the medical profession, and the more strain on an already failing NHS. It is evident that many physicians and medical leaders remain either unaware of the latest evidence or too deeply entrenched in the corrupted ties between the healthcare profession and the pharmaceutical industry to recognise clear conflicts of interest.