Facing growing international outrage, Bill Gates has arrogantly waved off damning accusations of genocide, ignoring documented evidence that links his so-called “health initiatives” to the deaths of millions of children.
When questioned about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s specific and detailed accusations, Gates told the Wall Street Journal that he’s “prepared to let the public decide.”
This is an astonishing response from a man at the center of such grave claims, who is currently facing legal jeopardy in all four corners of the world, including an upcoming trial in the Netherlands for misleading the public about Covid mRNA vaccines.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
The self-appointed globalist health czar and pandemic whisperer continues to raise eyebrows with his statements about an impending health emergency.
Big Pharma Whistleblower Found Dead After Confirming Ivermectin Cures Cancer
During the interview with WSJ Editor-in-Chief Emma Tucker, Gates declared, “The chance of a natural pandemic in the next four years is somewhere between 10 and 15 percent.”
His choice of words and confident prediction have left many questioning how he arrives at such precise figures—and why he seems so invested in the next global crisis.
“It’d be nice to think we’re actually more ready for that than we were last time. But so far we’re not,” Gates added, almost as if laying the groundwork for another round of draconian health measures.
His insistence that the world remains “absolutely not” prepared has sparked skepticism from critics who note that Gates has been a central figure in shaping pandemic policies—and profiting handsomely from them—while failing to inspire trust.
Blaming political divisions and what he describes as a lack of consensus on the “tools needed” for preparedness, Gates remarked, “People, rather than having a consensus about what tools are missing, are mostly still replaying the various mistakes that were made.”
Many have questioned if Gates’ vision for “consensus” simply means more centralized control in the hands of global elites.
His final statement, however, is what raised the most suspicion: “I wouldn’t say that we’re as far along as you’d expect after trillions of dollars and millions of lives have been lost.”
Considering Gates’ outsized role in pandemic response strategies and vaccine development—coupled with documented failures and ethical concerns—many are left wondering why he continues to position himself as a trusted voice in global health.
Is Gates warning of future pandemics out of genuine concern, or is this yet another calculated move by a man who seems all too comfortable profiting from global crises? The world may not be ready for another pandemic—but it’s becoming increasingly prepared to question Gates’ true motives.