- Nationwide anti-Trump demonstrations are not spontaneous but part of a calculated «color revolution» campaign funded by NGOs, unions and far-left networks.
Data shows many protesters are repeat participants, suggesting organized efforts with paid or bussed-in agitators.
- Groups like Indivisible Project, Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) are central players. Some have ties to foreign influence networks, including Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.
- Some protests featured displays honoring militants involved in attacks, alongside vandalism and arson. Democratic leaders like Bernie Sanders and Jamie Raskin have publicly endorsed the demonstrations.
- The same strategies from the 2020 BLM-Antifa riots are being reused: NGO funding, media amplification and undermining law enforcement. «Defund the Police» policies and understaffed agencies leave cities vulnerable to destabilization.
Fresh intelligence suggests the nationwide anti-Trump protests are not organic expressions of public dissent but a calculated «color revolution» campaign — bankrolled by billionaire-funded NGOs, militant unions and far-left activist networks. Over the weekend, more than 1,200 demonstrations erupted across all 50 states, ostensibly protesting President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, federal downsizing and new tariffs. However, geospatial analysts and protest-tracking firms have uncovered a troubling pattern: these crowds are not grassroots but heavily coordinated—dominated by professional activists, repeat rally attendees and groups with direct ties to Democrat operatives and foreign influence networks.
Geofencing data exposes the «rent-a-mob» pipeline
Tony Seruga, a data scientist specializing in GPS tracking and protest metrics, found that at a recent Chicago rally, 92% of attendees had participated in five or more prior demonstrations — including Kamala Harris campaign events, BLM-Antifa riots and pro-Hamas protests. Organizers boasted 30,000 attendees, but Seruga’s real-time telemetry showed only 7,500 unique participants, indicating artificial crowd inflation via paid or bussed-in agitators.
Similar patterns emerged in Denver, where 84% of protesters had attended at least nine prior rallies, and 31% had been to 20+ events — a clear hallmark of professional activism rather than spontaneous outrage. In Portland, police reports revealed that the same core group of 200-300 agitators cycled through multiple «local» protests, with many receiving stipends from activist nonprofits.
The key players behind the unrest
Among the primary organizers driving this campaign:
- Indivisible Project (501(c)(4)) – A well-funded activist hub co-founded by former Democratic congressional staffers, linked to planned civil disobedience training ahead of the 2024 election.
- Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) – Openly advocates for «revolutionary socialism» and has funneled resources into occupation-style protests, including recent takeovers of federal buildings.
- American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) – Currently facing a federal lawsuit for allegedly serving as Hamas’s U.S. propaganda arm, AMP has coordinated protests glorifying terrorists involved in the October 7th massacre.
- Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups – Documents reveal financial and logistical ties between U.S.-based Islamist networks and foreign-backed destabilization efforts.
Terrorist glorification and escalating violence
In Washington, D.C., protesters at a concurrent pro-Hamas rally displayed murals of militants like Walid Daqqa — a Palestinian terrorist convicted of torturing and murdering an Israeli soldier in 1984 — and Hossam Shabat, a Hamas sniper who also worked as an Al Jazeera «journalist.» Organized by AMP, the event devolved into vandalism, arson and chants of «From the river to the sea», while Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) praised the demonstrations as a «moral uprising.»
A blueprint from 2020
The parallels to the BLM-Antifa riots of 2020 are impossible to ignore. Back then, Democrats and media elites openly coordinated with protest groups — MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow bragged about activists «working in lockstep» with party leadership, while Indivisible’s Ezra Levin falsely claimed the unrest was «bottom-up.» Yet forensic audits later proved massive NGO funding, freelance agitator networks and even foreign dark money fueled the chaos.
Now, the same playbook is being reused: manufactured outrage, media amplification, elite validation and the deliberate erosion of public trust in law enforcement. With the «Defund the Police» movement leaving agencies understaffed, and the National Guard increasingly deployed as private security for corporations, the stage is set for widespread instability — precisely the outcome these groups seek.
Trump’s rising polls defy the narrative
Despite the relentless protest coverage, Trump’s approval has surged to 53% nationally, with a 13-point spike among young voters since March — hardly reflective of the so-called «national uprising» narrative. Instead, the real agenda appears to be:
- Destabilizing Trump’s governance – Creating perpetual chaos to paralyze his administration and justify emergency measures.
- Psychological warfare – Using riots, media panic and stochastic terrorism to demoralize conservative voters.
- Regime change by proxy – If electoral defeat fails, forced resignation through unrest — akin to Ukraine’s 2014 Maidan coup.
America’s division is being manufactured
These protests are not about policy disagreements — they’re a soft coup attempt, cloaked in social justice rhetoric. The same NGOs that orchestrated the 2020 «Summer of Love» riots and planned post-election shutdowns are now reactivating their networks.
For ordinary Americans, the takeaway is clear: The unrest isn’t organic. It’s funded, it’s calculated and it’s meant to destroy. Whether through mass protests, media psyops, or federal building occupations, the endgame remains regime change—by any means necessary.
The only question left is: Will the silent majority let it happen again?
Sources include: