- A new study links unvaccinated women near COVID-19-vaccinated individuals to menstrual irregularities, suggesting possible vaccine «shedding.»
- The study raises concerns about mRNA vaccine safety and the lack of pre-rollout shedding studies.
- Critics highlight censorship of women reporting menstrual changes and call for transparency in vaccine research.
- Researchers urge further investigation into vaccine component transmission and emphasize the need for informed consent.
In a groundbreaking study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, researchers uncovered a startling connection: Unvaccinated women who were in close proximity to individuals who received COVID-19 vaccines reported experiencing menstrual irregularities similar to those reported by vaccinated women. The findings, which suggest the possibility of vaccine «shedding,» have reignited debates over the safety of mRNA vaccines and the Biden administration’s aggressive push for mass vaccination without adequate long-term testing.
The study, led by researchers including Dr. Brian Hooker, Chief Scientific Officer of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), analyzed survey data from 3,390 unvaccinated women with no prior COVID-19 infection. Of these women, 85.5% reported being within six feet of a vaccinated person, and 71.7% experienced irregular menstrual symptoms within one week of exposure. The study’s authors noted that the timing and severity of these symptoms were statistically significant, raising questions about whether vaccine components could be transmitted from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals.
The study found that unvaccinated women who had daily close contact with vaccinated individuals outside their households were at the highest risk of menstrual irregularities, including heavier bleeding (34%), early period onset (28%), and extended bleeding (26%). Interestingly, women who lived with vaccinated partners or household members did not show the same increased risk, suggesting that environmental factors or prolonged exposure to larger groups of vaccinated individuals may play a role.
Dr. Hooker emphasized that while the study does not definitively prove vaccine shedding, it provides compelling evidence that warrants further investigation. “This important study affirms that women exposed to individuals outside their household who received modified mRNA jabs for COVID-19 indeed experienced significantly higher levels of menstrual issues…” he told The Defender.
Vaccine mandates and censorship put women at risk
The study’s findings have reignited criticism of the Biden administration’s handling of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The administration and its allies on social media platforms actively silenced women who reported menstrual irregularities following vaccination. In 2021, a Facebook group with over 20,000 members sharing personal testimonies about menstrual changes was abruptly deleted, stifling crucial conversations about vaccine safety.
Tiffany Parotto, founder of MyCycleStory and a co-author of the study, highlighted the importance of giving women a voice. “The need to research these occurrences and give a voice to the women who were silenced was obvious,” she wrote.
The study also raises questions about the lack of pre-rollout shedding studies for mRNA vaccines. Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation, pointed out that the FDA issued guidance for shedding studies in 2015 for gene therapies but failed to apply the same standards to COVID-19 vaccines. “Why didn’t our regulatory agencies conduct shedding studies before mass product rollout?” he asked.
The study’s authors called for increased funding and research into the potential transmission of vaccine components, emphasizing the need for transparency and informed consent. Dr. Pierre Kory, president emeritus of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, described the findings as “highly compelling” and urged regulatory agencies to take immediate action.
Heather Ray, a science and research analyst with CHD, criticized the systemic gaslighting of women who reported adverse effects. “Over the past four years, women have continually been gaslighted, censored, and silenced by the media, the medical system, and government agencies regarding their experiences with the COVID-19 shot,” she said.
The study’s findings underscore the need for a more cautious and transparent approach to vaccine development and distribution. While the Biden administration and social media platforms have dismissed concerns about menstrual irregularities, this research highlights the importance of listening to women’s experiences and conducting thorough safety studies before mandating experimental treatments. As the debate over vaccine safety continues, one thing is clear: women’s health should never be an afterthought.
Sources for this article include: