- The Bank of England has warned about significant risks to U.K. pension savings due to the growing reliance on funded reinsurance, a complex financial tool involving third-party entities like private equity firms and foreign insurers to guarantee pension payouts.
- Funded reinsurance arrangements are increasingly complex and lack transparency, potentially exposing U.K. savers to counterparty risks, where the failure of one party could disrupt the entire system.
- The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has capped funded reinsurance at £250 million ($305.8 million) per deal and raised concerns about the unclear origins of funds, often tied to illiquid assets or alternative asset managers.
- The Bank of England has drawn parallels to the 2008 financial crisis, warning that unchecked growth in funded reinsurance could lead to systemic risks, emphasizing the need for stronger risk management practices.
- The Bank of England is prioritizing oversight, including a funded reinsurance recapture scenario in the 2025 Life Insurance Stress Test, urging insurers to address risks and safeguard the U.K.’s £3 trillion ($3.67 trillion) pension savings.
The Bank of England has issued a stark warning about the potential risks to billions of pounds in U.K. pension savings, citing concerns over the increasing reliance on a complex financial tool known as funded reinsurance. In an advisory notice sent to insurance companies last week, the Bank highlighted an «endemic risk» associated with the use of overseas insurance cash to pay out pensions.
Funded reinsurance, a mechanism used by insurers to guarantee pension payouts, has become a focal point of concern for regulators. The practice involves third-party entities, including private equity firms and foreign insurance companies, providing the necessary funds to ensure pension schemes can meet their obligations. However, the Bank of England has warned that the complexity and opacity of these arrangements could inadvertently expose U.K. savers to significant risks.
Gareth Truran, executive director at the Bank of England, and Shoib Khan, director, emphasized that while pension savers’ cash is not immediately at risk, the growing use of funded reinsurance warrants closer scrutiny. The Bank has pledged to monitor the situation closely and take action if necessary to safeguard savers’ interests.
The rise of funded reinsurance
In recent years, insurance giants such as Legal & General (L&G) and Aviva have been acquiring U.K. pension schemes, particularly those offering «gold-plated» benefits. To secure these deals, insurers must guarantee they can meet future pension obligations, often turning to funded reinsurance for support. This has led to a surge in cross-border reinsurance arrangements, with billions of pounds flowing from foreign entities into U.K. pension schemes.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the Bank of England’s regulatory arm, has expressed concerns about the origins of these funds. In November 2023, the PRA noted that the money often comes from companies with unclear backgrounds, which may be heavily invested in illiquid assets or linked to alternative asset managers. This lack of transparency raises the specter of counterparty risk, where the failure of one party in a financial transaction could have cascading effects across the system.
The PRA has already imposed limits on the use of funded reinsurance, capping it at £250 million ($305.8 million) per buyout deal. However, the regulator has warned that if firms fail to address the risks adequately, further crackdowns could be on the horizon.
Lessons from the past
The Bank of England’s concerns are not without precedent. The 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, which owed $613 billion at the time of its bankruptcy, was exacerbated by complex counterparty risks that took years to unravel. While the funds were eventually recovered, the episode underscored the dangers of opaque financial arrangements.
The PRA has drawn parallels between the current situation and the 2008 crisis, warning that unchecked growth in funded reinsurance transactions could lead to a rapid buildup of systemic risks. The regulator has called on firms to strengthen their risk management practices and set prudent limits on exposures.
A call for action
The Bank of England has made it clear that addressing these risks is a priority. A funded reinsurance recapture scenario will be included in the 2025 Life Insurance Stress Test, and firms are expected to make rapid progress in closing gaps in their risk management frameworks.
The stakes are high. The U.K.’s pension savings total an estimated £3 trillion ($3.67 trillion), and any disruption to this market could have far-reaching consequences for millions of savers. As the Bank of England steps up its oversight, the onus is on insurers and reinsurers to ensure that the financial tools they employ do not jeopardize the retirement security of U.K. citizens.
In the meantime, pension savers are advised to stay informed about the risks and seek professional advice to protect their hard-earned savings. With the Bank of England sounding the alarm, the message is clear: vigilance is essential in safeguarding the future of U.K. pensions.
Sources include: