Climate Scientists Now Claiming Global Warming Causes Freezing Winters and Cold Blasts

Global warming making winters colder? That’s the outlandish claim the Associated Press and its climate propagandist Seth Borenstein want you to accept.

“Frigid air that normally stays trapped in the Arctic has escaped, plunging deep into the United States for an extended visit that is expected to provoke teeth-chattering but not be record-shattering,” wrote Borenstein, whose AP story archive is littered with the typical left-wing climate candy you’ve come to expect from liberal journalists.

“It’s a cold air outbreak that some experts say is happening more frequently, and paradoxically, because of a warming world,” Seth continues.

The claim that colder winters and frequent cold weather blasts are a result of global warming is not just counterintuitive—it’s downright absurd and unscientific.

That hasn’t stopped Borenstein writing the same story, blaming global warming every time the US experiences a colder than average winter.

The climate cabal are desperate to make this Orwellian narrative stick, so let’s cut through the alarmist spin and take a closer look at why this narrative falls apart under even the slightest scrutiny.

1. Polar Vortex Events Are Not Linked to Emissions or Warming

The concept of the polar vortex—a large area of low pressure and cold air surrounding the poles—has been well-documented for decades.

While disruptions to the polar vortex can cause extreme cold weather in certain regions, these events are not a byproduct of human emissions or global warming.

As JunkScience points out, there is no clear scientific evidence connecting these phenomena to rising global temperatures. The attempt to link them is simply scaremongering by the mainstream media on behalf of their paymasters.

2. The Historical Flip-Flop: Cooling in the 1970s, Warming Today

In 1978, the New York Times reported that the polar vortex would cause extreme global cooling. In the late 70s, the mainstream media were conditioning their audience to fear an incoming ice age.

This stands in stark contrast to today’s narrative, where the same phenomenon is used as evidence for global warming.

Such flip flops reveal how climate discourse has shifted over time to fit narratives and agendas, rather than adhering to rigorous scientific standards.

3. Financial Ties Between Globalist Foundations and the AP

The AP’s climate reporting is heavily funded by left-wing and globalist foundations that pour millions into promoting alarmist narratives.

These financial incentives call into question the objectivity of the AP’s climate coverage.

When journalism is underwritten by organizations with a clear ideological agenda, it becomes difficult to separate fact from lucrative narrative.

Convenient Alarmism or Science?

The claim that global warming causes more frequent cold weather defies common sense and scientific consistency. It reflects a broader trend where any extreme weather event—hot or cold—is attributed to climate change, creating a narrative that is unfalsifiable and, therefore, unscientific.

True science demands rigorous evidence and an openness to debate, not convenient explanations that shift with the political winds.

Skepticism is a cornerstone of scientific inquiry, and it’s essential when addressing complex topics like climate change. The AP’s reporting on this issue serves as a reminder that we must critically evaluate the narratives presented to us, especially when they appear to be driven by ideological or financial motivations rather than hard evidence.